No other Gospel (1.6-9)
Paul normally follows his introductory words with praise for the grace of God evident in his readers’ faith (e.g. Romans 1.8; 1 Corinthians 1.4-9). In Galatians, however, he launches immediately into the vital subject of this letter. Were the churches he had planted in Galatia now turning away from the Gospel he had preached and which had been the foundation of those churches? He opens with the strong verb “I am astonished” (1.6) that they have so quickly turned their backs on God, who had called them. Paul here contrasts the call of God which had been in his grace with their turning into a different gospel. As believers, we stand in God’s grace, but what is the present direction of our theology and of our life?
As Guthrie points out, the verb ‘desert’ (1.6) is colourfully used of military revolt. Guthrie asserts therefore that Paul ”thinks of the readers as having changed sides”. If indeed they allow themselves to be misled into this ‘different gospel’, they lose their position as true followers of Christ. Having used the term ‘different gospel’, Paul immediately corrects his error. There is no other gospel. Their new ‘gospel’ is “no Gospel at all” (1.7). We may deepen our understanding of the fundamental Gospel and apply it afresh, but the central truths of the Gospel abide eternally.
Paul realises that there must be some false teachers who are ‘throwing the Galatians into confusion’ and ‘trying to pervert the Gospel of Christ’ (1.7). Stott helpfully points out that the verb ‘throw into confusion’ has the root meaning of ‘shake’ or ‘agitate’. Through this false ‘gospel’ they are losing their confident peace and assurance. Anxious uncertainty disturbs the still waters of their faith. The verb translated ‘pervert’ carries the sense of so changing the Gospel’s content that they are utterly reversing it.
In his letter to the Galatians, Paul is battling for the very heart of the Gospel. To this end, he declares with shattering emphasis that anyone preaching some other so-called ‘Gospel’ should be “anathema”, cursed of God (1.8, 9; NIV “eternally condemned”). Even if Paul himself or his associates (“we” in 1.8) or “an angel from heaven” preach a different ‘gospel’, God’s curse will be their portion.
No human Gospel (1.10-12)
These next verses form the background to Paul’s letter to the Galatians. Neither Paul himself nor his message stem from any human source; rather, they came directly from God through the revelation of Christ by the Holy Spirit. He starts with a vital question, using an interesting verb (1.10: Greek peitho). In the New Testament generally, ‘peitho’ is commonly, but wrongly, translated as ‘obey’ in English translations. It actually means ‘yield to persuasion’. NIV translates it here as ‘trying to win the approval’. Paul is asking the rhetorical question of whether he is being persuaded by other people. Or was he called at his conversion to be subject entirely to Christ (1.10)? He then emphatically asserts that the Gospel he preached was not just a human message with a human origin (1.11). He had not received it from any human source, nor had he been taught it by other Christians (1.12). On the contrary, he received it entirely by divine revelation from Jesus Christ. It would seem that he is referring to his conversion on the Damascus road (Acts 9.1-16), confirmed by his time in Arabia (1.17).
No human authority (1.13-24)
In this letter to the Galatians Paul opposes those who demand that non-Jewish converts must become proselytes who follow Torah (including circumcision). This error had its base in the Jerusalem church with its strong emphasis on mission among Jews, so Paul demonstrates that he received his message from God, not from the leaders in Jerusalem. He was not subject to their authority.
Although he had been highly trained in Judaism and had become a leader in anti-Christian persecution (1.13/14), God already had greater things in mind for him. God had indeed already chosen him before his birth. God then called him to follow Christ and revealed Jesus to him – as Paul says in 1.15, his call to faith and service of Christ was gloriously “by his grace”. God’s call and purpose for Paul was that he should preach the good news of Jesus “among the Gentiles” (1.16). God wanted to use Paul to widen the circle of salvation to reach every nation and people, not only Jews and a few proselytes or God-fearers (who believed in the God of Israel, but didn’t submit to circumcision). This great calling and purpose of God should still challenge all of us as Christians today.
Paul now goes into some detail to prove that his message did indeed come from God, not from the commissioning of church leaders in Jerusalem. He lived under the authority of the Lord alone, not even the apostles in the mother-church. Following his conversion he didn’t consult with other church leaders, but went straight to the wilderness of Arabia. We should love to know why he went to such a desert place and what he did there! Was he studying his Old Testament to learn how his new faith and mission fitted into God’s biblical revelation? He must have been praying fervently for God’s mind in his new situation.
After three years he did go to Jerusalem and had a fortnight staying with Peter and meeting James, Jesus’ brother (1.18-20). But still the churches in Judea never got to know him, so cannot have influenced him in his preaching. They only heard reports of the conversion and Christian preaching of “the man who formerly persecuted us” (1.23).
In typical Pauline fashion, the chapter ends with the climax statement that “they glorified God because of me” (1.24). We have already noted how the verses of introduction (1.1-5) also concluded with the great aim that God might be glorified (1.5). International mission lies at the heart of this letter with its key message to every nation of justification by faith, not by works of Law. But the ultimate goal of God being glorified and honoured always remains. It underlies everything that Paul believes and does. May it be so for us too! To God be the glory!
Recent Comments